MLR
Price
$40.16
Change
-$0.50 (-1.23%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
460.16M
18 days until earnings call
PLOW
Price
$30.30
Change
-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
698.14M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLR vs PLOW

Header iconMLR vs PLOW Comparison
Open Charts MLR vs PLOWBanner chart's image
Miller Industries
Price$40.16
Change-$0.50 (-1.23%)
Volume$55.17K
Capitalization460.16M
Douglas Dynamics
Price$30.30
Change-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Volume$106.05K
Capitalization698.14M
MLR vs PLOW Comparison Chart in %
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLR vs. PLOW commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLR is a Hold and PLOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MLR: $40.16 vs. PLOW: $30.30)
Brand notoriety: MLR and PLOW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLR: 49% vs. PLOW: 85%
Market capitalization -- MLR: $460.16M vs. PLOW: $698.14M
MLR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $460.16M. PLOW’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $698.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $86.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLOW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLOW is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLOW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLOW is a better buy in the short-term than MLR.

Price Growth

MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while PLOW (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

PLOW is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.74% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLOW($698M) has a higher market cap than MLR($460M). MLR (11.06) and PLOW (10.86) have similar P/E ratio . PLOW YTD gains are higher at: 32.314 vs. MLR (-37.708). PLOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 115M vs. MLR (70.1M). MLR has less debt than PLOW: MLR (55.4M) vs PLOW (277M). MLR has higher revenues than PLOW: MLR (976M) vs PLOW (582M).
MLRPLOWMLR / PLOW
Capitalization460M698M66%
EBITDA70.1M115M61%
Gain YTD-37.70832.314-117%
P/E Ratio11.0610.86102%
Revenue976M582M168%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt55.4M277M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLR vs PLOW: Fundamental Ratings
MLR
PLOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7593
SMR RATING
1..100
6937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLOW's Valuation (17) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLR (94). This means that PLOW’s stock grew significantly faster than MLR’s over the last 12 months.

MLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PLOW (93). This means that MLR’s stock grew similarly to PLOW’s over the last 12 months.

PLOW's SMR Rating (37) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MLR (69). This means that PLOW’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

PLOW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MLR (60). This means that PLOW’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

PLOW's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MLR (42). This means that PLOW’s stock grew similarly to MLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLRPLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGIQX17.170.17
+1.00%
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
CESGX12.140.09
+0.75%
Coho Relative Value ESG
EISGX16.950.09
+0.53%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
FCDTX36.71N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp M
GCSUX31.39-0.20
-0.63%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6

MLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLR has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLR jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLR
1D Price
Change %
MLR100%
-1.23%
PHIN - MLR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ALSN - MLR
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
PLOW - MLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
VC - MLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
ATMU - MLR
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More

PLOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLOW has been loosely correlated with MLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLOW jumps, then MLR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLOW
1D Price
Change %
PLOW100%
-0.56%
MLR - PLOW
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
SMP - PLOW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
ATMU - PLOW
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
FOXF - PLOW
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
VC - PLOW
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
More