MLR
Price
$43.65
Change
-$0.44 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
568.05M
10 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$52.36
Change
+$2.46 (+4.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLR vs PHIN

Header iconMLR vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts MLR vs PHINBanner chart's image
Miller Industries
Price$43.65
Change-$0.44 (-1.00%)
Volume$115.15K
Capitalization568.05M
PHINIA
Price$52.36
Change+$2.46 (+4.93%)
Volume$646.06K
Capitalization1.78B
MLR vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLR vs. PHIN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLR is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MLR: $43.65 vs. PHIN: $52.36)
Brand notoriety: MLR and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLR: 166% vs. PHIN: 139%
Market capitalization -- MLR: $568.05M vs. PHIN: $1.78B
MLR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $568.05M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than MLR.

Price Growth

MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.71% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($1.78B) has a higher market cap than MLR($568M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than MLR: PHIN (18.24) vs MLR (9.79). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 9.981 vs. MLR (-32.619). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 433M vs. MLR (93M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. MLR (29.9M). MLR has less debt than PHIN: MLR (60.8M) vs PHIN (864M). PHIN has higher revenues than MLR: PHIN (3.5B) vs MLR (1.15B).
MLRPHINMLR / PHIN
Capitalization568M1.78B32%
EBITDA93M433M21%
Gain YTD-32.6199.981-327%
P/E Ratio9.7918.2454%
Revenue1.15B3.5B33%
Total Cash29.9M365M8%
Total Debt60.8M864M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLR: Fundamental Ratings
MLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLRPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSMGX14.090.16
+1.15%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
HSMBX37.420.36
+0.97%
Horizon Multi-Factor Small/Mid Cap Adv
SSGSX45.370.32
+0.71%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
CREEX9.64N/A
N/A
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst
RYVCX156.19-0.79
-0.50%
Rydex Energy Services C

MLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLR has been loosely correlated with ALSN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLR jumps, then ALSN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLR
1D Price
Change %
MLR100%
-1.00%
ALSN - MLR
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
PHIN - MLR
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.93%
SRI - MLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
VC - MLR
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
BWA - MLR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+4.93%
BWA - PHIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
ALV - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
VC - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
ALSN - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
LEA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-8.09%
More