MLR
Price
$40.16
Change
-$0.50 (-1.23%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
460.16M
18 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$53.05
Change
-$0.33 (-0.62%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLR vs PHIN

Header iconMLR vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts MLR vs PHINBanner chart's image
Miller Industries
Price$40.16
Change-$0.50 (-1.23%)
Volume$55.17K
Capitalization460.16M
PHINIA
Price$53.05
Change-$0.33 (-0.62%)
Volume$255.09K
Capitalization2.06B
MLR vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLR vs. PHIN commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLR is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MLR: $40.16 vs. PHIN: $53.05)
Brand notoriety: MLR and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLR: 49% vs. PHIN: 62%
Market capitalization -- MLR: $460.16M vs. PHIN: $2.06B
MLR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $460.16M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $86.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the long-term than MLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than MLR.

Price Growth

MLR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.74% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.06B) has a higher market cap than MLR($460M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than MLR: PHIN (20.48) vs MLR (11.06). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 11.967 vs. MLR (-37.708). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 452M vs. MLR (70.1M). MLR has less debt than PHIN: MLR (55.4M) vs PHIN (1.04B). PHIN has higher revenues than MLR: PHIN (3.36B) vs MLR (976M).
MLRPHINMLR / PHIN
Capitalization460M2.06B22%
EBITDA70.1M452M16%
Gain YTD-37.70811.967-315%
P/E Ratio11.0620.4854%
Revenue976M3.36B29%
Total CashN/A347M-
Total Debt55.4M1.04B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLR: Fundamental Ratings
MLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLRPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGIQX17.170.17
+1.00%
Macquarie Growth and Income R6
CESGX12.140.09
+0.75%
Coho Relative Value ESG
EISGX16.950.09
+0.53%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap I
FCDTX36.71N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp M
GCSUX31.39-0.20
-0.63%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6

MLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLR has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLR jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLR
1D Price
Change %
MLR100%
-1.23%
PHIN - MLR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ALSN - MLR
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
PLOW - MLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
VC - MLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
ATMU - MLR
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-0.62%
BWA - PHIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
VC - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
AXL - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
ATMU - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
ALSN - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More