Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison
Open Charts MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPX vs. NML commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPX is a Hold and NML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPX has more net assets: 2.47B vs. NML (513M). MLPX has a higher annual dividend yield than NML: MLPX (0.299) vs NML (-4.201). MLPX was incepted earlier than NML: MLPX (12 years) vs NML (13 years). MLPX (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than NML (1.98). NML has a higher turnover MLPX (23.59) vs MLPX (23.59).
| MLPX | NML | MLPX / NML | |
| Gain YTD | 0.299 | -4.201 | -7% |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 513M | 482% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.98 | 23% |
| Turnover | 23.59 | 27.00 | 87% |
| Yield | 4.54 | 7.11 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MLPX | NML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITAN | 34.62 | 0.16 | +0.48% |
| Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | |||
| FLCV | 29.90 | 0.10 | +0.34% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| FXN | 15.34 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| GSST | 50.60 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | |||
| RAA | 27.40 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF | |||
MLPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPX has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPX jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPX | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| OKE - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| WMB - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| KMI - MLPX | 85% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| TRGP - MLPX | 84% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| DTM - MLPX | 83% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
NML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y