Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPX vs. NML commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPX is a Buy and NML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPX has more net assets: 2.62B vs. NML (534M). MLPX has a higher annual dividend yield than NML: MLPX (3.446) vs NML (1.976). MLPX was incepted earlier than NML: MLPX (12 years) vs NML (13 years). MLPX (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than NML (1.98). NML has a higher turnover MLPX (23.59) vs MLPX (23.59).
| MLPX | NML | MLPX / NML | |
| Gain YTD | 3.446 | 1.976 | 174% |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 534M | 490% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.98 | 23% |
| Turnover | 23.59 | 27.00 | 87% |
| Yield | 4.81 | 7.01 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MLPX | NML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PUI | 44.00 | 0.18 | +0.40% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF | |||
| PJAN | 46.94 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| ABOT | 39.93 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF | |||
| NDAA | 22.12 | N/A | N/A |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dyn Allc ETF | |||
| OAIM | 41.87 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| OneAscent International Equity ETF | |||
MLPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPX has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPX jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPX | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| OKE - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| WMB - MLPX | 85% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| KMI - MLPX | 84% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| DTM - MLPX | 81% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| ET - MLPX | 81% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
NML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y