Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPX vs. NML commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPX is a Buy and NML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPX has more net assets: 2.81B vs. NML (584M). NML has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPX: NML (10.386) vs MLPX (9.070). MLPX was incepted earlier than NML: MLPX (13 years) vs NML (13 years). MLPX (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than NML (1.98). NML has a higher turnover MLPX (23.59) vs MLPX (23.59).
| MLPX | NML | MLPX / NML | |
| Gain YTD | 9.070 | 10.386 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 584M | 482% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.98 | 23% |
| Turnover | 23.59 | 27.00 | 87% |
| Yield | 4.51 | 6.61 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MLPX | NML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QIG | 44.97 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| WisdomTree US Corporate Bond | |||
| IPB | 26.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Merrill Lynch Depositor | |||
| FCT | 9.98 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II | |||
| EURL | 47.35 | -0.62 | -1.29% |
| Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X ETF | |||
| USXF | 57.92 | -1.06 | -1.80% |
| iShares® ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | |||
MLPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPX has been closely correlated with WMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPX jumps, then WMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPX | 100% | +2.26% | ||
| WMB - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| OKE - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | +3.92% | ||
| KMI - MLPX | 84% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| DTM - MLPX | 83% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| TRGP - MLPX | 80% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
More | ||||
NML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y