Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison
Open Charts MLPX vs NML
MLPX vs NML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPX vs. NML commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPX is a Buy and NML is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPX has more net assets: 2.49B vs. NML (539M). NML has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPX: NML (3.671) vs MLPX (2.027). MLPX was incepted earlier than NML: MLPX (12 years) vs NML (13 years). MLPX (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than NML (1.98). NML has a higher turnover MLPX (23.59) vs MLPX (23.59).
| MLPX | NML | MLPX / NML | |
| Gain YTD | 2.027 | 3.671 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 539M | 463% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.98 | 23% |
| Turnover | 23.59 | 27.00 | 87% |
| Yield | 4.87 | 7.41 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MLPX | NML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 29 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QID | 20.11 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| ProShares UltraShort QQQ | |||
| FFEB | 55.79 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Feb | |||
| CAMX | 30.78 | N/A | N/A |
| Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | |||
| NJUN | 31.09 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun | |||
| GRNY | 25.46 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | |||
MLPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPX has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPX jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPX | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| OKE - MLPX | 86% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| WMB - MLPX | 85% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| KMI - MLPX | 84% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DTM - MLPX | 82% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| TRGP - MLPX | 82% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||
NML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y