MLPNF
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.65M
ZNCXF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPNF vs ZNCXF

Header iconMLPNF vs ZNCXF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs ZNCXFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.03
Change-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Volume$15.6K
Capitalization14.65M
Zincx Res
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$47.46K
Capitalization13.47M
MLPNF vs ZNCXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. ZNCXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Hold and ZNCXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $1.03 vs. ZNCXF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and ZNCXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 7% vs. ZNCXF: 107%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $14.65M vs. ZNCXF: $13.47M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.65M. ZNCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZNCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZNCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MLPNF and ZNCXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLPNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZNCXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZNCXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLPNF is a better buy in the short-term than ZNCXF.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while ZNCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than ZNCXF($13.5M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 375.860 vs. ZNCXF (34.641). ZNCXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -657.87K vs. MLPNF (-3.1M). MLPNF has more cash in the bank: 1.9M vs. ZNCXF (423K). MLPNF has less debt than ZNCXF: MLPNF (0) vs ZNCXF (37.1K). MLPNF (0) and ZNCXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MLPNFZNCXFMLPNF / ZNCXF
Capitalization14.7M13.5M109%
EBITDA-3.1M-657.87K472%
Gain YTD375.86034.6411,085%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.9M423K450%
Total Debt037.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZNCXF: Fundamental Ratings
ZNCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPNFZNCXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMCC7.980.02
+0.25%
Freddie Mac
PNGZF0.03N/A
N/A
GCX Metals Ltd.
SBNC8400.00N/A
N/A
Southern Bancshares (N.C.), Inc.
EFGIF13.24N/A
N/A
EFG International AG
IVPAF7.60-0.21
-2.69%
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and IPGDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and IPGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-4.62%
IPGDF - MLPNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
USCUF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.61%
ZNCXF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZNCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZNCXF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZNCXF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZNCXF
1D Price
Change %
ZNCXF100%
N/A
ABRMF - ZNCXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNDAF - ZNCXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARAAF - ZNCXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
PGXFF - ZNCXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLPNF - ZNCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
More