MLPNF
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.04 (-3.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.65M
ZNCXF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
13.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPNF vs ZNCXF

Header iconMLPNF vs ZNCXF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs ZNCXFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.29
Change-$0.04 (-3.01%)
Volume$50.54K
Capitalization14.65M
Zincx Res
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.3K
Capitalization13.47M
MLPNF vs ZNCXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. ZNCXF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Hold and ZNCXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $1.29 vs. ZNCXF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and ZNCXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 47% vs. ZNCXF: 29%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $14.65M vs. ZNCXF: $13.47M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.65M. ZNCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZNCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZNCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZNCXF is a better buy in the long-term than MLPNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLPNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZNCXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZNCXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZNCXF is a better buy in the short-term than MLPNF.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.83% price change this week, while ZNCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +14.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than ZNCXF($13.5M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 497.829 vs. ZNCXF (56.303). ZNCXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -657.87K vs. MLPNF (-3.1M). MLPNF has more cash in the bank: 1.9M vs. ZNCXF (423K). MLPNF has less debt than ZNCXF: MLPNF (0) vs ZNCXF (37.1K). MLPNF (0) and ZNCXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MLPNFZNCXFMLPNF / ZNCXF
Capitalization14.7M13.5M109%
EBITDA-3.1M-657.87K472%
Gain YTD497.82956.303884%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.9M423K450%
Total Debt037.1K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZNCXF: Fundamental Ratings
ZNCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPNFZNCXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMXMF149.3814.33
+10.61%
Biomerieux 69 Marcy L'Etoile
CBCY935.00N/A
N/A
Central Bancompany
MTFC68.00N/A
N/A
Minster Financial Corp.
NOPMF11.93-0.33
-2.69%
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
BRVO0.05-0.02
-28.79%
Bravo Multinational Incorporated

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and IPGDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and IPGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-2.71%
IPGDF - MLPNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USCUF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.94%
ZNCXF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZNCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZNCXF and ABRMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZNCXF and ABRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZNCXF
1D Price
Change %
ZNCXF100%
N/A
ABRMF - ZNCXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNDAF - ZNCXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-9.77%
ARAAF - ZNCXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.18%
PGXFF - ZNCXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLPNF - ZNCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More