MLPNF
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.65M
USCUF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLPNF vs USCUF

Header iconMLPNF vs USCUF Comparison
Open Charts MLPNF vs USCUFBanner chart's image
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.03
Change-$0.05 (-4.63%)
Volume$15.6K
Capitalization14.65M
US Copper
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$168.25K
Capitalization5.08M
MLPNF vs USCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLPNF vs. USCUF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPNF is a Hold and USCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLPNF: $1.03 vs. USCUF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: MLPNF and USCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLPNF: 7% vs. USCUF: 160%
Market capitalization -- MLPNF: $14.65M vs. USCUF: $5.08M
MLPNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.65M. USCUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLPNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLPNF is a better buy in the long-term than USCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLPNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USCUF is a better buy in the short-term than MLPNF.

Price Growth

MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while USCUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($14.7M) has a higher market cap than USCUF($5.08M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 375.860 vs. USCUF (132.000). USCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -527.34K vs. MLPNF (-3.1M). MLPNF (1.9M) and USCUF (1.84M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MLPNF has less debt than USCUF: MLPNF (0) vs USCUF (60K). MLPNF (0) and USCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MLPNFUSCUFMLPNF / USCUF
Capitalization14.7M5.08M290%
EBITDA-3.1M-527.34K589%
Gain YTD375.860132.000285%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.9M1.84M103%
Total Debt060K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
USCUF: Fundamental Ratings
USCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLPNFUSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSRR32.240.89
+2.82%
Sierra Bancorp
ESNT61.900.78
+1.28%
Essent Group Ltd
RTX145.751.23
+0.85%
RTX Corp
EWTX13.030.02
+0.15%
Edgewise Therapeutics
FSEA11.25N/A
N/A
First Seacoast Bancorp

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and IPGDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and IPGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
-4.62%
IPGDF - MLPNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
USCUF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.61%
ZNCXF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

USCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USCUF and CAPFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USCUF and CAPFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USCUF
1D Price
Change %
USCUF100%
-9.61%
CAPFF - USCUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLPNF - USCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
MMLTF - USCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLXEF - USCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRCF - USCUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%
More