Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPFX vs TMLAX
MLPFX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPFX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPFX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. TMLAX (127M). MLPFX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: MLPFX (6.11) vs TMLAX (4.08). MLPFX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: MLPFX (16 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX (6%) and TMLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MLPFX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.51 vs. TMLAX (-0.06). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 173.73 vs. TMLAX (76.29).
| MLPFX | TMLAX | MLPFX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.860 | 1.714 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 127M | 1,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.11 | 4.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | -0.06 | -7,180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.53 | 46.83 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.73 | 76.29 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.01 | 118.85 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement