Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLPFX vs TMLAX
MLPFX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLPFX vs. TMLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLPFX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPFX has more cash in the bank: 2.18B vs. TMLAX (137M). MLPFX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: MLPFX (5.72) vs TMLAX (3.80). MLPFX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: MLPFX (16 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). MLPFX (10.29) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. MLPFX (20.00). MLPFX (6%) and TMLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MLPFX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. TMLAX (6.57). MLPFX return over 5 years is better than : 190.10 vs. TMLAX (91.98).
| MLPFX | TMLAX | MLPFX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.29 | 1.56 | 660% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.773 | 8.229 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 137M | 1,588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.72 | 3.80 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 6.57 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.42 | 58.72 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 190.10 | 91.98 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.26 | 120.84 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement