Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLNCX vs RNPFX
MLNCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts MLNCX vs RNPFX
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr C
Price$25.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.17M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
MLNCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLNCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLNCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. MLNCX (362M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than MLNCX: RNPFX (0.69) vs MLNCX (0.00). MLNCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: MLNCX (10 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). MLNCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). MLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLNCX: RNPFX (250) vs MLNCX (1000). MLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RNPFX (12.04). MLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.05 vs. RNPFX (22.53).
| MLNCX | RNPFX | MLNCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.46 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.46 | 457% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.920 | 14.587 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 12.04 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.36 | 54.03 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.05 | 22.53 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers