MLLUY
Price
$5.31
Change
+$0.10 (+1.92%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
NWSGY
Price
$9.68
Change
+$0.03 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLLUY vs NWSGY

Header iconMLLUY vs NWSGY Comparison
Open Charts MLLUY vs NWSGYBanner chart's image
Metallurgical Corp China
Price$5.31
Change+$0.10 (+1.92%)
Volume$159
Capitalization5.5B
CTF Services
Price$9.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
Volume$359
Capitalization3.96B
MLLUY vs NWSGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLLUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLLUY vs. NWSGY commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLLUY is a Buy and NWSGY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MLLUY: $5.31 vs. NWSGY: $9.68)
Brand notoriety: MLLUY and NWSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLLUY: 55% vs. NWSGY: 48%
Market capitalization -- MLLUY: $5.5B vs. NWSGY: $3.96B
MLLUY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.5B. NWSGY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLLUY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWSGY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MLLUY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWSGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWSGY is a better buy in the long-term than MLLUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLLUY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWSGY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLLUY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NWSGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MLLUY and NWSGY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MLLUY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +43.21% price change this week, while NWSGY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLLUY($5.5B) has a higher market cap than NWSGY($3.96B). NWSGY has higher P/E ratio than MLLUY: NWSGY (13.25) vs MLLUY (8.61). MLLUY YTD gains are higher at: 56.016 vs. NWSGY (18.094).
MLLUYNWSGYMLLUY / NWSGY
Capitalization5.5B3.96B139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD56.01618.094310%
P/E Ratio8.6113.2565%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLLUY vs NWSGY: Fundamental Ratings
MLLUY
NWSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5625
SMR RATING
1..100
8610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWSGY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLUY (19). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew similarly to MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLUY (56). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew similarly to MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLLUY (86). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew significantly faster than MLLUY’s over the last 12 months.

MLLUY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NWSGY (50). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew similarly to NWSGY’s over the last 12 months.

MLLUY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NWSGY (44). This means that MLLUY’s stock grew similarly to NWSGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLLUYNWSGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLLUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TYLG33.790.16
+0.49%
Global X Information Tch Cvd Cll&Gr ETF
BKAG42.170.15
+0.36%
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
TMB25.550.07
+0.27%
Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF
PFL8.53N/A
N/A
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
PBJ47.40-0.07
-0.16%
Invesco Food & Beverage ETF

MLLUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLLUY and PNOCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLLUY and PNOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLLUY
1D Price
Change %
MLLUY100%
N/A
PNOCF - MLLUY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMF - MLLUY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KIERF - MLLUY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSGY - MLLUY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCR - MLLUY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

NWSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWSGY has been loosely correlated with TNISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWSGY jumps, then TNISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWSGY
1D Price
Change %
NWSGY100%
N/A
TNISF - NWSGY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DNERF - NWSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOPHY - NWSGY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - NWSGY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - NWSGY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More