Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLINX vs RGEBX
MLINX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLINX vs RGEBX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.02
Change+$0.12 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
MLINX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLINX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLINX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MLINX (14.1B). MLINX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLINX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLINX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MLINX (1.14) and RGEBX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: RGEBX (250) vs MLINX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. MLINX (-5.11). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. MLINX (-2.53).
| MLINX | RGEBX | MLINX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.09 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.09 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.963 | 10.904 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 323B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.11 | 10.04 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.96 | 57.17 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.53 | 45.69 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.84 | 78.56 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement