MLI
Price
$97.54
Change
+$0.17 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.8B
45 days until earnings call
TUSK
Price
$2.29
Change
-$0.06 (-2.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
110.36M
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLI vs TUSK

Header iconMLI vs TUSK Comparison
Open Charts MLI vs TUSKBanner chart's image
Mueller Industries
Price$97.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.17%)
Volume$532.98K
Capitalization10.8B
Mammoth Energy Services
Price$2.29
Change-$0.06 (-2.55%)
Volume$54.33K
Capitalization110.36M
MLI vs TUSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLI vs. TUSK commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLI is a Buy and TUSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLI: $97.54 vs. TUSK: $2.29)
Brand notoriety: MLI and TUSK are both not notable
MLI represents the Metal Fabrication, while TUSK is part of the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLI: 62% vs. TUSK: 62%
Market capitalization -- MLI: $10.8B vs. TUSK: $110.36M
MLI [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $10.8B. TUSK’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $110.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $136.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTUSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TUSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLI is a better buy in the long-term than TUSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TUSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TUSK is a better buy in the short-term than MLI.

Price Growth

MLI (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while TUSK (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

TUSK is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-0.09% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.57% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLI($10.8B) has a higher market cap than TUSK($110M). MLI YTD gains are higher at: 24.022 vs. TUSK (-23.667). TUSK has less debt than MLI: TUSK (5.26M) vs MLI (30.9M).
MLITUSKMLI / TUSK
Capitalization10.8B110M9,818%
EBITDAN/A-10.97M-
Gain YTD24.022-23.667-101%
P/E Ratio15.51N/A-
RevenueN/A189M-
Total CashN/A127M-
Total Debt30.9M5.26M587%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLI vs TUSK: Fundamental Ratings
MLI
TUSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
815
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
889
SMR RATING
1..100
3695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLI's Valuation (38) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as TUSK (59) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for TUSK (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew significantly faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's SMR Rating (36) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (95) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as TUSK (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.

TUSK's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MLI (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to MLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLITUSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TORXF36.430.48
+1.34%
Torex Gold Resources Inc.
CMDXF4.51N/A
+0.09%
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
CYDX0.25N/A
N/A
CYduct Diagnostics Inc.
AKRBY12.65N/A
N/A
Aker BP Asa
PRKR0.29-0.03
-8.36%
Parkervision, Inc.

MLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLI
1D Price
Change %
MLI100%
+0.43%
ESAB - MLI
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
CRS - MLI
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.98%
ATI - MLI
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
RYI - MLI
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
CODI - MLI
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

TUSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUSK
1D Price
Change %
TUSK100%
-2.55%
MLI - TUSK
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
TRC - TUSK
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
IIIN - TUSK
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
BOC - TUSK
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
MEC - TUSK
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
More