Advertisement
MLI vs TUSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLI is a Hold and TUSK is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MLI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLI’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MLI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TUSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MLI (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -2.85% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLI is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+0.65% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| MLI | TUSK | MLI / TUSK | |
| Capitalization | 9.23B | 177M | 5,215% |
| EBITDA | 892M | 67M | 1,331% |
| Gain YTD | 5.796 | -15.667 | -37% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.19 | 23.38 | 65% |
| Revenue | 3.92B | 309M | 1,268% |
| Total Cash | 874M | 16.6M | 5,265% |
| Total Debt | 32.9M | 63.3M | 52% |
MLI | TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MLI's Valuation (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (74) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for TUSK (85) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew significantly faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's SMR Rating (40) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (97) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (84) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as MLI (28) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to MLI’s over the last 12 months.
| MLI | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 8 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SABA | 9.26 | 0.16 | +1.76% |
| Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | |||
| PJAN | 44.39 | 0.06 | +0.13% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| NVBW | 32.47 | 0.04 | +0.13% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF | |||
| RSSL | 87.02 | -0.45 | -0.52% |
| Global X Russell 2000 ETF | |||
| BTRN | 41.56 | -0.31 | -0.75% |
| Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | |||
MLI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLI | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| ESAB - MLI | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| CRS - MLI | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| ATI - MLI | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| RYI - MLI | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| IIIN - MLI | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||
TUSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| CODI - TUSK | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.92% | ||
| MLI - TUSK | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| TRC - TUSK | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| IIIN - TUSK | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| MEC - TUSK | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||