MLGF
Price
$20.33
Change
+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
TFSL
Price
$13.40
Change
+$0.15 (+1.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLGF vs TFSL

Header iconMLGF vs TFSL Comparison
Open Charts MLGF vs TFSLBanner chart's image
Malaga Financial
Price$20.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization41.82M
TFS Financial
Price$13.40
Change+$0.15 (+1.13%)
Volume$237.3K
Capitalization3.53B
MLGF vs TFSL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLGF vs. TFSL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGF is a Buy and TFSL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MLGF: $20.33 vs. TFSL: $13.40)
Brand notoriety: MLGF and TFSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGF: 258% vs. TFSL: 72%
Market capitalization -- MLGF: $41.82M vs. TFSL: $3.53B
MLGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.82M. TFSL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFSL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the long-term than TFSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFSL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TFSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the short-term than TFSL.

Price Growth

MLGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while TFSL (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFSL($3.53B) has a higher market cap than MLGF($41.8M). TFSL has higher P/E ratio than MLGF: TFSL (49.46) vs MLGF (7.61). TFSL YTD gains are higher at: 11.467 vs. MLGF (-6.984). MLGF has less debt than TFSL: MLGF (263M) vs TFSL (5.06B). TFSL has higher revenues than MLGF: TFSL (300M) vs MLGF (18M).
MLGFTFSLMLGF / TFSL
Capitalization41.8M3.53B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.98411.467-61%
P/E Ratio7.6149.4615%
Revenue18M300M6%
Total CashN/A45.9M-
Total Debt263M5.06B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF vs TFSL: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
TFSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1373
SMR RATING
1..100
517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6948
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TFSL (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew significantly faster than TFSL’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFSL (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFSL’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as TFSL (17) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to TFSL’s over the last 12 months.

TFSL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (60) in the null industry. This means that TFSL’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TFSL's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (69) in the null industry. This means that TFSL’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLGFTFSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARGNF547.60N/A
N/A
Argen X NV
CZBC9.99N/A
N/A
Citizens Bancorp
DLTTF5.38N/A
N/A
Dalata Hotel Group PLC
INDOY5.24N/A
N/A
Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited
NYWKF1.80N/A
N/A
NTG Clarity Networks Inc.

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and AFNL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and AFNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
+0.40%
AFNL - MLGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBC - MLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
RBB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TFSL - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBKB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More