MLGF
Price
$20.33
Change
+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
RBB
Price
$18.37
Change
-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
324.95M
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLGF vs RBB

Header iconMLGF vs RBB Comparison
Open Charts MLGF vs RBBBanner chart's image
Malaga Financial
Price$20.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
Volume$5.45K
Capitalization41.82M
RBB Ban
Price$18.37
Change-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization324.95M
MLGF vs RBB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLGF vs. RBB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGF is a Buy and RBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MLGF: $20.33 vs. RBB: $18.50)
Brand notoriety: MLGF and RBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGF: 258% vs. RBB: 86%
Market capitalization -- MLGF: $41.82M vs. RBB: $324.95M
MLGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.82M. RBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $324.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBB is a better buy in the long-term than MLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RBB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MLGF and RBB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MLGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while RBB (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBB is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBB($325M) has a higher market cap than MLGF($41.8M). RBB (7.79) and MLGF (7.61) have similar P/E ratio . MLGF YTD gains are higher at: -6.984 vs. RBB (-8.037). MLGF has less debt than RBB: MLGF (263M) vs RBB (315M). RBB has higher revenues than MLGF: RBB (134M) vs MLGF (18M).
MLGFRBBMLGF / RBB
Capitalization41.8M325M13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.984-8.03787%
P/E Ratio7.617.7998%
Revenue18M134M13%
Total CashN/A246M-
Total Debt263M315M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGF vs RBB: Fundamental Ratings
MLGF
RBB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1371
SMR RATING
1..100
541
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6912
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5015

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBB's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (34) in the null industry. This means that RBB’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBB (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBB’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBB (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBB’s over the last 12 months.

RBB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MLGF (60) in the null industry. This means that RBB’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RBB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGF (69) in the null industry. This means that RBB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLGFRBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RELV2.31N/A
N/A
Reliv International, Inc.
HTCMF24.97N/A
N/A
Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
INBC11.20N/A
N/A
InBankshares, Corp
JNPKF22.25N/A
N/A
Jenoptik AG
PRNDY21.17-0.29
-1.35%
Pernod Ricard S.A.

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and AFNL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and AFNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
+0.40%
AFNL - MLGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBC - MLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
RBB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TFSL - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
RBKB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More

RBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBB has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBB jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBB
1D Price
Change %
RBB100%
+0.82%
AROW - RBB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
UBSI - RBB
83%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
EQBK - RBB
82%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
SFNC - RBB
82%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
FFIN - RBB
81%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
More