MLGCF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
MSMGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
11.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLGCF vs MSMGF

Header iconMLGCF vs MSMGF Comparison
Open Charts MLGCF vs MSMGFBanner chart's image
M3 Metals
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization1.6M
Grid Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.28K
Capitalization11.08M
MLGCF vs MSMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLGCF vs. MSMGF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGCF is a Hold and MSMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MLGCF: $0.16 vs. MSMGF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MLGCF and MSMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGCF: 120% vs. MSMGF: 1%
Market capitalization -- MLGCF: $1.6M vs. MSMGF: $11.08M
MLGCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.6M. MSMGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MLGCF and MSMGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLGCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSMGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MSMGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGCF is a better buy in the short-term than MSMGF.

Price Growth

MLGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSMGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSMGF($11.1M) has a higher market cap than MLGCF($1.6M). MSMGF YTD gains are higher at: 123.120 vs. MLGCF (7.266). MLGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -548.15K vs. MSMGF (-1.79M). MLGCF has more cash in the bank: 846K vs. MSMGF (613K). MLGCF (0) and MSMGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MLGCFMSMGFMLGCF / MSMGF
Capitalization1.6M11.1M14%
EBITDA-548.15K-1.79M31%
Gain YTD7.266123.1206%
P/E Ratio15.82N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash846K613K138%
Total DebtN/A217K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGCF vs MSMGF: Fundamental Ratings
MLGCF
MSMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLGCF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (93). This means that MLGCF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (100). This means that MLGCF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (100). This means that MLGCF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (49). This means that MSMGF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMGF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (3). This means that MSMGF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLGCFMSMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QNCCF0.830.02
+2.12%
Quantum eMotion Corp.
CDAUF10.18N/A
N/A
Compass Digital Acquisition Corp.
LSRCF104.32N/A
N/A
Lasertec Corp.
IPCFF17.76N/A
-0.01%
International Petroleum Corp. CDA
DTEAF0.69-0.03
-3.78%
DAVIDsTEA Inc

MLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGCF has been loosely correlated with PPZRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGCF jumps, then PPZRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGCF
1D Price
Change %
MLGCF100%
N/A
PPZRF - MLGCF
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAXPF - MLGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOEYF - MLGCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLNLF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
ULTHF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.36%
More

MSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSMGF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSMGF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSMGF
1D Price
Change %
MSMGF100%
N/A
KCCFF - MSMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
MTLFF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
DMXCF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
MLGCF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRDF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More