MLFNF
Price
$24.17
Change
+$0.66 (+2.81%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
NCHEY
Price
$12.10
Change
+$1.10 (+10.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLFNF vs NCHEY

Header iconMLFNF vs NCHEY Comparison
Open Charts MLFNF vs NCHEYBanner chart's image
Maple Leaf Foods
Price$24.17
Change+$0.66 (+2.81%)
Volume$710
Capitalization3.02B
Nichirei
Price$12.10
Change+$1.10 (+10.00%)
Volume$319
Capitalization2.91B
MLFNF vs NCHEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLFNF vs. NCHEY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLFNF is a Hold and NCHEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MLFNF: $24.17 vs. NCHEY: $12.10)
Brand notoriety: MLFNF and NCHEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLFNF: 38% vs. NCHEY: 100%
Market capitalization -- MLFNF: $3.02B vs. NCHEY: $2.91B
MLFNF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.02B. NCHEY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLFNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCHEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCHEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLFNF is a better buy in the long-term than NCHEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLFNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MLFNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MLFNF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +14.82% price change this week, while NCHEY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.82% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFNF($3.02B) and NCHEY($2.91B) have the same market capitalization . MLFNF has higher P/E ratio than NCHEY: MLFNF (23.06) vs NCHEY (18.12). MLFNF YTD gains are higher at: 71.418 vs. NCHEY (0.000). NCHEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.8B vs. MLFNF (544M). NCHEY has more cash in the bank: 32.7B vs. MLFNF (119M). MLFNF has less debt than NCHEY: MLFNF (1.86B) vs NCHEY (102B). NCHEY has higher revenues than MLFNF: NCHEY (695B) vs MLFNF (4.99B).
MLFNFNCHEYMLFNF / NCHEY
Capitalization3.02B2.91B104%
EBITDA544M64.8B1%
Gain YTD71.4180.000-
P/E Ratio23.0618.12127%
Revenue4.99B695B1%
Total Cash119M32.7B0%
Total Debt1.86B102B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLFNF vs NCHEY: Fundamental Ratings
MLFNF
NCHEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7766
SMR RATING
1..100
8197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3970
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLFNF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCHEY (98). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

NCHEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (77). This means that NCHEY’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as NCHEY (97). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew similarly to NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NCHEY (70). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew similarly to NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

NCHEY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLFNF (100). This means that NCHEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLFNFNCHEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCCHX20.940.11
+0.53%
GMO Climate Change III
FTRNX200.580.73
+0.37%
Fidelity Trend
RTIYX12.060.04
+0.33%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq Y
CNPFX69.340.20
+0.29%
American Funds New Perspective 529F
SIGWX7.020.01
+0.14%
Touchstone Small Company Y

MLFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLFNF and BRCC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLFNF and BRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLFNF
1D Price
Change %
MLFNF100%
+2.81%
BRCC - MLFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+11.63%
NCHEY - MLFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - MLFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
NCRA - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFF - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NCHEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCHEY and LYSFF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCHEY and LYSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCHEY
1D Price
Change %
NCHEY100%
N/A
LYSFF - NCHEY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - NCHEY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
LDSVF - NCHEY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLFNF - NCHEY
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
NFPDF - NCHEY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More