Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLCPX vs SPNNX
MLCPX vs SPNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLCPX vs. SPNNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCPX is a Buy and SPNNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNNX has more cash in the bank: 3.95B vs. MLCPX (814M). SPNNX pays higher dividends than MLCPX: SPNNX (7.33) vs MLCPX (5.07). MLCPX was incepted earlier than SPNNX: MLCPX (11 years) vs SPNNX (6 years). MLCPX (12.21) is less costly to investors than SPNNX (6.81). MLCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.31 vs. SPNNX (11.00). SPNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLCPX: SPNNX (1000) vs MLCPX (2500). MLCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.35 vs. SPNNX (11.74). SPNNX (239.69) and MLCPX (236.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MLCPX | SPNNX | MLCPX / SPNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.81 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.81 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.991 | 4.562 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 814M | 3.95B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.07 | 7.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.35 | 11.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.62 | 70.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 236.25 | 239.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement