Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLCPX vs SPMHX
MLCPX vs SPMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLCPX vs. SPMHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCPX is a Hold and SPMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMHX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. MLCPX (734M). SPMHX pays higher dividends than MLCPX: SPMHX (5.51) vs MLCPX (5.23). MLCPX was incepted earlier than SPMHX: MLCPX (12 years) vs SPMHX (6 years). MLCPX (12.21) is less costly to investors than SPMHX (6.29). SPMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLCPX (15.31). MLCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMHX: MLCPX (2500) vs SPMHX (1000000). SPMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.09 vs. MLCPX (1.84). SPMHX (257.56) and MLCPX (248.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MLCPX | SPMHX | MLCPX / SPMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.29 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.29 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.926 | -1.504 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 1.01B | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.23 | 5.51 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.84 | 6.09 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.93 | 72.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 248.51 | 257.56 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement