Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLCPX vs SPMGX
MLCPX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLCPX vs. SPMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCPX is a StrongBuy and SPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMGX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. MLCPX (757M). SPMGX (5.98) and MLCPX (5.70) have matching dividends . MLCPX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: MLCPX (12 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). MLCPX (12.21) is less costly to investors than SPMGX (6.88). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. MLCPX (15.31). SPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLCPX: SPMGX (1000) vs MLCPX (2500). SPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. MLCPX (0.24). SPMGX (235.64) and MLCPX (229.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MLCPX | SPMGX | MLCPX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.88 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 12.21 | 6.88 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.106 | 1.335 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 1.03B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.70 | 5.98 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | 2.88 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.33 | 66.21 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 229.67 | 235.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement