Advertisement
MLCO vs SJMHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCO is a StrongBuy and SJMHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MLCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MLCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SJMHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MLCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +7.02% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.97% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| MLCO | SJMHF | MLCO / SJMHF | |
| Capitalization | 3.52B | 2.5B | 140% |
| EBITDA | 1.05B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 55.440 | 7.149 | 775% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.11 | 8460.39 | 0% |
| Revenue | 4.93B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.12B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.46B | N/A | - |
MLCO | SJMHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MLCO's Valuation (79) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (99) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
MLCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SJMHF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
MLCO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (58) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SJMHF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLCO (87) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
| MLCO | SJMHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
MLCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been closely correlated with LVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then LVS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCO | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| LVS - MLCO | 68% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| WYNN - MLCO | 67% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| SCHYY - MLCO | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| GXYYY - MLCO | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| MGM - MLCO | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||
SJMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SJMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJMHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SJMHY - SJMHF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SJMHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
| SCHYF - SJMHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| MLCO - SJMHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| WYNN - SJMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||