MLCI
Price
$8.54
Change
+$0.08 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
109.2M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAX
Price
$17.43
Change
+$0.20 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.75B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLCI vs PAX

Header iconMLCI vs PAX Comparison
Open Charts MLCI vs PAXBanner chart's image
Mount Logan Capital
Price$8.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.95%)
Volume$116.02K
Capitalization109.2M
Patria Investments
Price$17.43
Change+$0.20 (+1.16%)
Volume$485.97K
Capitalization2.75B
MLCI vs PAX Comparison Chart in %
MLCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLCI vs. PAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLCI is a Hold and PAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MLCI: $8.54 vs. PAX: $17.43)
Brand notoriety: MLCI and PAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLCI: 114% vs. PAX: 103%
Market capitalization -- MLCI: $109.2M vs. PAX: $2.75B
MLCI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $109.2M. PAX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLCI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the long-term than MLCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLCI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than MLCI.

Price Growth

MLCI (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLCI is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2026.

PAX is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.21% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.75B) has a higher market cap than MLCI($109M). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 9.692 vs. MLCI (3.515). PAX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 170M vs. MLCI (11.9M). MLCI has more cash in the bank: 152M vs. PAX (52.4M). MLCI has less debt than PAX: MLCI (91.1M) vs PAX (171M). PAX has higher revenues than MLCI: PAX (406M) vs MLCI (196M).
MLCIPAXMLCI / PAX
Capitalization109M2.75B4%
EBITDA11.9M170M7%
Gain YTD3.5159.69236%
P/E RatioN/A25.80-
Revenue196M406M48%
Total Cash152M52.4M290%
Total Debt91.1M171M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLCI: Fundamental Ratings
MLCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLCIPAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TZINX3.020.02
+0.67%
Templeton Global Dynamic Income Adv
RGLGX29.240.10
+0.34%
American Funds Global Insight R-6
MDEGX16.080.03
+0.19%
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Inv A
GQEPX20.250.03
+0.15%
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Inv
GABTX23.19-0.13
-0.56%
Gabelli Global Content & Connect AAA

MLCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCI has been loosely correlated with HSDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLCI jumps, then HSDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLCI
1D Price
Change %
MLCI100%
+0.95%
HSDT - MLCI
43%
Loosely correlated
-11.17%
PAX - MLCI
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
BPYPM - MLCI
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
GCMG - MLCI
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
GBLBF - MLCI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
+1.16%
BN - PAX
67%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
CG - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
KKR - PAX
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
APO - PAX
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
VINP - PAX
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
More