Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLACX vs RGEBX
MLACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGEBX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.49
Change-$0.05 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
MLACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MLACX (13.5B). MLACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLACX (20 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGEBX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. MLACX (-22.59). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. MLACX (-39.49).
| MLACX | RGEBX | MLACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.09 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.09 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.662 | 4.829 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 306B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.59 | 7.68 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.79 | 51.01 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.49 | 45.42 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.94 | 65.87 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement