Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLACX vs RGAFX
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts MLACX vs RGAFX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change-$0.11 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.34
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
MLACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLACX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLACX (13.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: RGAFX (0.52) vs MLACX (0.00). MLACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: MLACX (21 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: RGAFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. MLACX (-22.96). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. MLACX (-44.26).
| MLACX | RGAFX | MLACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.34 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.34 | 556% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.550 | 19.981 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 340B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.96 | 9.22 | -249% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.91 | 66.11 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -44.26 | 41.72 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.75 | 104.95 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement