MLAC
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
319.22M
TDAC
Price
$10.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
226.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLAC vs TDAC

Header iconMLAC vs TDAC Comparison
Open Charts MLAC vs TDACBanner chart's image
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.01K
Capitalization319.22M
Translational Development Acquisition
Price$10.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.37K
Capitalization226.52M
MLAC vs TDAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLAC vs. TDAC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAC is a StrongBuy and TDAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MLAC: $10.30 vs. TDAC: $10.34)
Brand notoriety: MLAC and TDAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLAC: 194% vs. TDAC: 35%
Market capitalization -- MLAC: $319.22M vs. TDAC: $226.52M
MLAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $319.22M. TDAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $226.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $171.77M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TDAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLAC is a better buy in the long-term than TDAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TDAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDAC is a better buy in the short-term than MLAC.

Price Growth

MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TDAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.12% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLAC($319M) has a higher market cap than TDAC($227M). MLAC has more cash in the bank: 1.16M vs. TDAC (35.3K).
MLACTDACMLAC / TDAC
Capitalization319M227M141%
EBITDAN/A-763.21K-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/A74.59-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash1.16M35.3K3,289%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLACTDAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTRMF0.08N/A
N/A
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
APAJF5.57N/A
N/A
APA Group Stapled Security
MXCHY1.55N/A
N/A
Orbia Advance Corp S A B
PFLC11.45N/A
N/A
Pacific Financial Corp.
RCRUY11.31-0.24
-2.08%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.

MLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAC
1D Price
Change %
MLAC100%
N/A
BOWNU - MLAC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMV - MLAC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMUF - MLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - MLAC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWN - MLAC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TDAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDAC and BEAG have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDAC and BEAG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDAC
1D Price
Change %
TDAC100%
N/A
BEAG - TDAC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLAC - TDAC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIMA - TDAC
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
ISRL - TDAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
CEP - TDAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
More