Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGEBX
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGEBX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$10.60
Change+$0.13 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
MLAAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MLAAX (14.1B). MLAAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MLAAX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MLAAX (0.95). MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGEBX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. MLAAX (-4.07). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. MLAAX (1.05).
| MLAAX | RGEBX | MLAAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.09 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.09 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.995 | 10.904 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 323B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.07 | 10.04 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.17 | 57.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.05 | 45.69 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.95 | 78.56 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement