Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MLAAX vs RGACX
MLAAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MLAAX vs RGACX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$10.96
Change-$0.24 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
MLAAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MLAAX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLAAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLAAX (13.7B). RGACX pays higher dividends than MLAAX: RGACX (0.07) vs MLAAX (0.00). MLAAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MLAAX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). MLAAX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . MLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLAAX: RGACX (250) vs MLAAX (15000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. MLAAX (-5.33). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. MLAAX (-6.04).
| MLAAX | RGACX | MLAAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.277 | 19.364 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 340B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | 8.31 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.08 | 63.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.04 | 37.90 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.80 | 98.36 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement