MKTX
Price
$217.38
Change
+$0.65 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:49 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.3B
9 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$109.20
Change
+$1.85 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKTX vs SF

Header iconMKTX vs SF Comparison
Open Charts MKTX vs SFBanner chart's image
MarketAxess Holdings
Price$217.38
Change+$0.65 (+0.30%)
Volume$200
Capitalization8.3B
Stifel Financial
Price$109.20
Change+$1.85 (+1.72%)
Volume$466.97K
Capitalization7.95B
MKTX vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MKTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKTX vs. SF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKTX is a StrongBuy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MKTX: $216.73 vs. SF: $109.20)
Brand notoriety: MKTX and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKTX: 60% vs. SF: 72%
Market capitalization -- MKTX: $8.3B vs. SF: $7.95B
MKTX [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.3B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKTX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MKTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than MKTX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MKTX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MKTX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than MKTX.

Price Growth

MKTX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

MKTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKTX($8.3B) and SF($7.95B) have the same market capitalization . MKTX has higher P/E ratio than SF: MKTX (31.60) vs SF (18.06). SF YTD gains are higher at: 3.896 vs. MKTX (-3.412). MKTX has less debt than SF: MKTX (79.7M) vs SF (1.18B). SF has higher revenues than MKTX: SF (4.29B) vs MKTX (753M).
MKTXSFMKTX / SF
Capitalization8.3B7.95B105%
EBITDA411MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.4123.896-88%
P/E Ratio31.6018.06175%
Revenue753M4.29B18%
Total Cash522MN/A-
Total Debt79.7M1.18B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKTX vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
MKTX
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
5210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2644
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKTX (91). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKTX’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKTX (100). This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than MKTX’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKTX (52). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKTX’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MKTX (56). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to MKTX’s over the last 12 months.

MKTX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (44). This means that MKTX’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MKTXSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MKTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKDV27.060.21
+0.78%
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
QARP54.380.41
+0.76%
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
EZJ43.27N/A
N/A
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
BAR32.88-0.23
-0.69%
GraniteShares Gold Trust
GOVZ9.41-0.21
-2.18%
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF

MKTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKTX has been loosely correlated with CME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKTX jumps, then CME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTX
1D Price
Change %
MKTX100%
-1.11%
CME - MKTX
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CBOE - MKTX
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
SF - MKTX
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
XP - MKTX
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
MC - MKTX
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+1.72%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
EVR - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
MS - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
RJF - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More