MKTW
Price
$18.03
Change
-$0.37 (-2.01%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.77M
PINC
Price
$24.45
Change
-$0.50 (-2.00%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.05B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKTW vs PINC

Header iconMKTW vs PINC Comparison
Open Charts MKTW vs PINCBanner chart's image
MarketWise
Price$18.03
Change-$0.37 (-2.01%)
Volume$500
Capitalization50.77M
Premier
Price$24.45
Change-$0.50 (-2.00%)
Volume$76.16K
Capitalization2.05B
MKTW vs PINC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MKTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKTW vs. PINC commentary
Aug 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKTW is a Hold and PINC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MKTW: $18.40 vs. PINC: $24.95)
Brand notoriety: MKTW and PINC are both not notable
MKTW represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while PINC is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKTW: 146% vs. PINC: 101%
Market capitalization -- MKTW: $50.77M vs. PINC: $2.05B
MKTW [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $50.77M. PINC’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $2.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKTW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MKTW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PINC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MKTW and PINC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MKTW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MKTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PINC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PINC is a better buy in the short-term than MKTW.

Price Growth

MKTW (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.19% price change this week, while PINC (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +6.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

PINC is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.65% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Services to the Health Industry (+3.66% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PINC($2.05B) has a higher market cap than MKTW($50.8M). PINC has higher P/E ratio than MKTW: PINC (24.46) vs MKTW (6.39). MKTW YTD gains are higher at: 70.268 vs. PINC (20.173). MKTW has less debt than PINC: MKTW (1.76M) vs PINC (283M).
MKTWPINCMKTW / PINC
Capitalization50.8M2.05B2%
EBITDAN/A270M-
Gain YTD70.26820.173348%
P/E Ratio6.3924.4626%
RevenueN/A1.26B-
Total CashN/A71.3M-
Total Debt1.76M283M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PINC: Fundamental Ratings
PINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MKTWPINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MKTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFSIB15.050.45
+3.08%
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
FGETF8.10N/A
N/A
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP LTD
KYKOF17.13N/A
N/A
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd.
WNLV0.16N/A
-1.64%
WINVEST GROUP LTD.
ALYAF1.50-0.03
-1.96%
Alithya Group Inc.

MKTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKTW and DJCO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKTW and DJCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKTW
1D Price
Change %
MKTW100%
-6.07%
DJCO - MKTW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
OSPN - MKTW
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
STNE - MKTW
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
OTEX - MKTW
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PINC - MKTW
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
More

PINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINC
1D Price
Change %
PINC100%
+1.30%
GDC - PINC
61%
Loosely correlated
+6.55%
ETWO - PINC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOX - PINC
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
LAW - PINC
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
PGNY - PINC
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
More