MKGAF
Price
$134.76
Change
+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
76.59B
PHCUF
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.04 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
128.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MKGAF vs PHCUF

Header iconMKGAF vs PHCUF Comparison
Open Charts MKGAF vs PHCUFBanner chart's image
Merck KGaA
Price$134.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Volume$163
Capitalization76.59B
Photocure ASA
Price$5.15
Change-$0.04 (-0.77%)
Volume$200
Capitalization128.95M
MKGAF vs PHCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MKGAF vs. PHCUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKGAF is a Hold and PHCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MKGAF: $134.87 vs. PHCUF: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: MKGAF and PHCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MKGAF: 8% vs. PHCUF: 39%
Market capitalization -- MKGAF: $76.59B vs. PHCUF: $128.95M
MKGAF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $76.59B. PHCUF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $128.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MKGAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MKGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MKGAF and PHCUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MKGAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHCUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MKGAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PHCUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKGAF is a better buy in the short-term than PHCUF.

Price Growth

MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +4.95% price change this week, while PHCUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.02% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKGAF($76.6B) has a higher market cap than PHCUF($129M). PHCUF has higher P/E ratio than MKGAF: PHCUF (500.00) vs MKGAF (20.96). PHCUF YTD gains are higher at: -8.036 vs. MKGAF (-11.015). MKGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.45B vs. PHCUF (-2.74M). MKGAF has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. PHCUF (246M). PHCUF has less debt than MKGAF: PHCUF (6.25M) vs MKGAF (10.6B). MKGAF has higher revenues than PHCUF: MKGAF (22.3B) vs PHCUF (418M).
MKGAFPHCUFMKGAF / PHCUF
Capitalization76.6B129M59,380%
EBITDA6.45B-2.74M-235,095%
Gain YTD-11.015-8.036137%
P/E Ratio20.96500.004%
Revenue22.3B418M5,335%
Total Cash1.72B246M700%
Total Debt10.6B6.25M169,600%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MKGAF vs PHCUF: Fundamental Ratings
MKGAF
PHCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
6989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
859
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MKGAF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHCUF (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (89). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MKGAF (61). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew similarly to MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

PHCUF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKGAF (85). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MKGAFPHCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAVE2.870.08
+2.87%
Rave Restaurant Group
ROAD108.382.26
+2.13%
Construction Partners
LOW228.311.37
+0.60%
Lowe's Companies
ARL14.48N/A
N/A
American Realty Investors
MSC4.24-0.16
-3.64%
Studio City International Holdings Limited

MKGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKGAF has been loosely correlated with MKKGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKGAF jumps, then MKKGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKGAF
1D Price
Change %
MKGAF100%
+0.12%
MKKGY - MKGAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
PHCUF - MKGAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDXF - MKGAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
OASMY - MKGAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBTSF - MKGAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PHCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHCUF has been loosely correlated with HLTRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHCUF jumps, then HLTRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHCUF
1D Price
Change %
PHCUF100%
N/A
HLTRF - PHCUF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INCR - PHCUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
ELAN - PHCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
MKKGY - PHCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CRYM - PHCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
More