Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$29.19
Change-$0.17 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. MKDCX (2.11B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (1.54) vs RNWBX (0.12). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.87). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). MKDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. RNWBX (14.20). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. MKDCX (16.57).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.354 | 23.440 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 74.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.12 | 1,281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.80 | 14.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.39 | 54.19 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.57 | 24.32 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers