Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$32.24
Change+$2.89 (+9.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MKDCX (2.08B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (4.00) vs RNWBX (0.45). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.87). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). MKDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.07 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. MKDCX (3.15).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.66 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.66 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.474 | 5.996 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 75.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 0.45 | 888% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.07 | 26.27 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.07 | 38.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.15 | 7.03 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers