Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKDCX vs RNWBX
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MKDCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts K
Price$29.93
Change-$0.30 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
MKDCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKDCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKDCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. MKDCX (2.02B). MKDCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MKDCX (1.50) vs RNWBX (0.12). MKDCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MKDCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MKDCX (0.87). MKDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKDCX: RNWBX (250) vs MKDCX (5000000). MKDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.74 vs. RNWBX (20.32). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. MKDCX (12.81).
| MKDCX | RNWBX | MKDCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.67 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.785 | 27.152 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 76.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.12 | 1,275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.74 | 20.32 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.83 | 47.10 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 21.37 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement