Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBFX
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$27.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MKCPX (1.7B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MKCPX (2.84) vs RLBFX (2.08). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MKCPX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. MKCPX (5.82). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. MKCPX (22.34).
| MKCPX | RLBFX | MKCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.945 | 9.922 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.08 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 8.29 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.18 | 30.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.34 | 39.76 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement