Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBFX
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$28.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. MKCPX (1.74B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MKCPX (2.68) vs RLBFX (1.97). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). MKCPX (0.48) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. MKCPX (6.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. MKCPX (22.32).
| MKCPX | RLBFX | MKCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.29 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.486 | 16.507 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.97 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 10.28 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 44.74 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.32 | 43.06 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement