Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBFX
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$27.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. MKCPX (1.65B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MKCPX (3.96) vs RLBFX (2.18). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MKCPX (7 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MKCPX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBFX (5.61) and MKCPX (5.57) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. MKCPX (29.19).
| MKCPX | RLBFX | MKCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.058 | 4.560 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.96 | 2.18 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | 5.61 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.17 | 33.66 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.19 | 40.09 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement