Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBFX
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$26.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MKCPX (1.69B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MKCPX (3.84) vs RLBFX (2.10). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MKCPX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 127.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. MKCPX (6.59). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. MKCPX (24.23).
| MKCPX | RLBFX | MKCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.536 | 9.189 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 2.10 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 10.60 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 35.79 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.23 | 41.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.15 | - |