Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MKCPX vs RLBFX
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MKCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced K
Price$27.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
MKCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MKCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MKCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. MKCPX (1.72B). MKCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MKCPX (2.76) vs RLBFX (2.05). MKCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MKCPX (8 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MKCPX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). MKCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MKCPX (5000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. MKCPX (5.96). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. MKCPX (21.99).
| MKCPX | RLBFX | MKCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.29 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.884 | 11.562 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 2.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 10.28 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.67 | 40.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.99 | 41.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement