MJGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
113.88M
MMTMF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
101.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJGCF vs MMTMF

Header iconMJGCF vs MMTMF Comparison
Open Charts MJGCF vs MMTMFBanner chart's image
Majestic Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.1K
Capitalization113.88M
Monument Mining
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization101.75M
MJGCF vs MMTMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJGCF vs. MMTMF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJGCF is a StrongBuy and MMTMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (MJGCF: $0.11 vs. MMTMF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: MJGCF and MMTMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJGCF: 77% vs. MMTMF: 39%
Market capitalization -- MJGCF: $113.88M vs. MMTMF: $101.75M
MJGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $113.88M. MMTMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $101.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJGCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMTMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MJGCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJGCF is a better buy in the long-term than MMTMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJGCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMTMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMTMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the short-term than MJGCF.

Price Growth

MJGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.87% price change this week, while MMTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.61% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJGCF($114M) has a higher market cap than MMTMF($102M). MJGCF has higher P/E ratio than MMTMF: MJGCF (11.05) vs MMTMF (4.40). MJGCF YTD gains are higher at: 105.009 vs. MMTMF (65.162). MMTMF (42.6M) and MJGCF (42M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . MMTMF has more cash in the bank: 29.2M vs. MJGCF (23.8M). MMTMF has less debt than MJGCF: MMTMF (115K) vs MJGCF (16.9M). MMTMF (77.6M) and MJGCF (74.9M) have equivalent revenues.
MJGCFMMTMFMJGCF / MMTMF
Capitalization114M102M112%
EBITDA42M42.6M99%
Gain YTD105.00965.162161%
P/E Ratio11.054.40251%
Revenue74.9M77.6M97%
Total Cash23.8M29.2M82%
Total Debt16.9M115K14,696%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJGCF vs MMTMF: Fundamental Ratings
MJGCF
MMTMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3127
SMR RATING
1..100
7249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5037

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MJGCF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MMTMF (88). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew similarly to MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (31). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (72). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MJGCF (38). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to MJGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MJGCF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMTMF (96). This means that MJGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJGCFMMTMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDFSX7.850.07
+0.90%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
MAGCX29.710.21
+0.71%
BlackRock Advantage Global Institutional
JLVRX20.560.14
+0.69%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R5
MXNZX8.30N/A
N/A
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index Instl
MSVDX5.22-0.02
-0.38%
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio I

MJGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MJGCF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MJGCF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJGCF
1D Price
Change %
MJGCF100%
+0.91%
GSISF - MJGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MJGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
MMTMF - MJGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
MGMLF - MJGCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
More

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMTMF has been loosely correlated with GSISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMTMF jumps, then GSISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
-1.82%
GSISF - MMTMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AUGO - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
MGMLF - MMTMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
MJGCF - MMTMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
MNDJF - MMTMF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More