MJDLF
Price
$6.68
Change
-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
595.69M
SMDZF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
19.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MJDLF vs SMDZF

Header iconMJDLF vs SMDZF Comparison
Open Charts MJDLF vs SMDZFBanner chart's image
Major Drilling Group International
Price$6.68
Change-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Volume$2.8K
Capitalization595.69M
Strategic Metals Ltd. New
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$145K
Capitalization19.25M
MJDLF vs SMDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MJDLF vs. SMDZF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MJDLF is a Hold and SMDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MJDLF: $6.68 vs. SMDZF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: MJDLF and SMDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MJDLF: 24% vs. SMDZF: 379%
Market capitalization -- MJDLF: $595.69M vs. SMDZF: $19.25M
MJDLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $595.69M. SMDZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $19.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MJDLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than SMDZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MJDLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMDZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than SMDZF.

Price Growth

MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while SMDZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJDLF($596M) has a higher market cap than SMDZF($19.3M). SMDZF (10.75) and MJDLF (10.27) have similar P/E ratio . SMDZF YTD gains are higher at: 23.762 vs. MJDLF (18.021). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 146M vs. SMDZF (-2.37M). MJDLF has more cash in the bank: 94.4M vs. SMDZF (10.6M). SMDZF has less debt than MJDLF: SMDZF (60K) vs MJDLF (25.6M). MJDLF has higher revenues than SMDZF: MJDLF (736M) vs SMDZF (0).
MJDLFSMDZFMJDLF / SMDZF
Capitalization596M19.3M3,088%
EBITDA146M-2.37M-6,167%
Gain YTD18.02123.76276%
P/E Ratio10.2710.7595%
Revenue736M0-
Total Cash94.4M10.6M891%
Total Debt25.6M60K42,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MJDLF vs SMDZF: Fundamental Ratings
MJDLF
SMDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8516

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMDZF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (74). This means that SMDZF’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMDZF (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (91). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SMDZF (52). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMDZF (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MJDLFSMDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERIXF8.57N/A
N/A
Ericsson (L.M.) Telephone Co.
BTOW1.24N/A
N/A
GTFN Holdings Inc.
SHANF0.31N/A
N/A
Shandong Molomg Petroleum Machinery Co., Ltd.
HPHTY5.61N/A
N/A
Hamamatsu Photonics
QMCI0.17-0.01
-3.36%
QuoteMedia, Inc.

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with AOTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then AOTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
-1.33%
AOTVF - MJDLF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ERMAY - MJDLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSCCF - MJDLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CAMZF - MJDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
More

SMDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMDZF and SYAAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMDZF and SYAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMDZF
1D Price
Change %
SMDZF100%
N/A
SYAAF - SMDZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
OMZNF - SMDZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
MJDLF - SMDZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SHTLF - SMDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
SLGGF - SMDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More