MIUFY
Price
$16.38
Change
-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.09B
PRPS
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MIUFY vs PRPS

Header iconMIUFY vs PRPS Comparison
Open Charts MIUFY vs PRPSBanner chart's image
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$16.38
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Volume$181
Capitalization12.09B
PROPELLUS
Price$0.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
Capitalization7.65M
MIUFY vs PRPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MIUFY vs. PRPS commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIUFY is a Buy and PRPS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MIUFY: $16.38 vs. PRPS: $0.85)
Brand notoriety: MIUFY and PRPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MIUFY: 65% vs. PRPS: 50%
Market capitalization -- MIUFY: $12.09B vs. PRPS: $7.65M
MIUFY [@Savings Banks] is valued at $12.09B. PRPS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $654.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MIUFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MIUFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRPS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PRPS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the short-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

MIUFY (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRPS (@Savings Banks) price change was +6.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.19% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($12.1B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($7.65M). MIUFY YTD gains are higher at: 32.632 vs. PRPS (-19.048). MIUFY has more cash in the bank: 385B vs. PRPS (6.51K). PRPS has less debt than MIUFY: PRPS (32.3K) vs MIUFY (7.99T).
MIUFYPRPSMIUFY / PRPS
Capitalization12.1B7.65M158,232%
EBITDA576BN/A-
Gain YTD32.632-19.048-171%
P/E Ratio12.96N/A-
Revenue2.08TN/A-
Total Cash385B6.51K5,910,346,945%
Total Debt7.99T32.3K24,733,746,130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY vs PRPS: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
PRPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3196
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRPS's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIUFY (67). This means that PRPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIUFY’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PRPS (100). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MIUFY (49). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to MIUFY’s over the last 12 months.

MIUFY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MIUFYPRPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWEN2.050.06
+2.76%
Broadwind
OLED149.503.19
+2.18%
Universal Display Corp
ACTG3.290.04
+1.23%
Acacia Research Corp
MD16.30-0.04
-0.24%
Pediatrix Medical Group
COST915.95-27.36
-2.90%
Costco Wholesale Corp

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - MIUFY
12%
Poorly correlated
-9.46%
SIXGF - MIUFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - MIUFY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LU - MIUFY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.97%
More

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and SUIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and SUIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
N/A
SUIG - PRPS
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
SIXGF - PRPS
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - PRPS
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIUFY - PRPS
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LU - PRPS
-7%
Poorly correlated
+4.97%
More