Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$14.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.48M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. MISFX (220M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.36) vs RNWHX (0.93). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (10 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. MISFX (10.89). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. MISFX (17.28).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.117 | 24.375 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 74.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 0.93 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 15.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 57.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.28 | 29.08 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement