Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWHX
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWHX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$13.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.28M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$91.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
MISFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. MISFX (229M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MISFX (2.30) vs RNWHX (0.91). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MISFX (11 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MISFX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWHX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. MISFX (12.84). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.37 vs. MISFX (1.12).
| MISFX | RNWHX | MISFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.72 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.675 | 20.889 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 0.91 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 18.96 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.65 | 44.08 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 11.37 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.37 | 90.22 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers