Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWBX
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWBX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$14.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.28M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. MISFX (229M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MISFX (2.30) vs RNWBX (0.12). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MISFX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MISFX (1.28). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWBX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. MISFX (15.81). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. MISFX (4.91).
| MISFX | RNWBX | MISFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.67 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.67 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.291 | 24.772 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 0.12 | 1,951% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 18.78 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.49 | 40.66 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.91 | 14.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.79 | 87.08 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers