Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MISFX vs RNWBX
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MISFX vs RNWBX
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inst
Price$13.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.28M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
MISFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MISFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MISFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. MISFX (229M). MISFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MISFX (2.30) vs RNWBX (0.12). MISFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MISFX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MISFX (1.28). MISFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.51 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MISFX: RNWBX (250) vs MISFX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. MISFX (12.84). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. MISFX (1.12).
| MISFX | RNWBX | MISFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.67 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.67 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.675 | 20.612 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 0.12 | 1,951% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 18.68 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.65 | 40.84 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 7.66 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.37 | 83.29 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers