Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$22.68
Change-$0.24 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets758.65M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$20.91
Change-$0.27 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 2.21B vs. MIPTX (759M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (2.55) vs TRZNX (1.80). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (15 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.57 vs. MIPTX (18.71).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.353 | 28.053 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 759M | 2.21B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.80 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.71 | 26.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.26 | 44.23 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.51 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement