Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs TRZNX
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs TRZNX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$20.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets707.1M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
MIPTX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. MIPTX (707M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than TRZNX: MIPTX (2.99) vs TRZNX (2.08). MIPTX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: MIPTX (15 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. TRZNX (54.80). TRZNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: TRZNX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). TRZNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. MIPTX (10.29).
| MIPTX | TRZNX | MIPTX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.714 | 13.603 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 1.94B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 2.08 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 16.44 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.51 | 18.62 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.77 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement