Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIPTX vs PNSIX
MIPTX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts MIPTX vs PNSIX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$19.04
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.65M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$18.00
Change-$0.08 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
MIPTX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIPTX vs. PNSIX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIPTX is a StrongBuy and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. MIPTX (694M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than PNSIX: MIPTX (3.16) vs PNSIX (1.22). MIPTX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: MIPTX (15 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. PNSIX (54.80). MIPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: MIPTX (100000) vs PNSIX (500000). PNSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. MIPTX (1.00). PNSIX return over 5 years is better than : -0.25 vs. MIPTX (-22.60).
| MIPTX | PNSIX | MIPTX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.86 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.489 | 8.458 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 694M | 1.87B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 1.22 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.00 | 9.22 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.44 | 13.27 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.60 | -0.25 | 9,059% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.16 | N/A | - |