Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIMSX vs TRQZX
MIMSX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts MIMSX vs TRQZX
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy I
Price$1.81
Change-$13.08 (-87.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.67M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
MIMSX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIMSX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIMSX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. MIMSX (150M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than MIMSX: TRQZX (0.74) vs MIMSX (0.22). MIMSX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: MIMSX (25 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). MIMSX (1.20) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). MIMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.73 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMSX: TRQZX (0) vs MIMSX (1000000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. MIMSX (-87.32). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. MIMSX (-91.51).
| MIMSX | TRQZX | MIMSX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.61 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.023 | -0.061 | -6,593% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 25.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.74 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -87.32 | -5.09 | 1,716% |
| Returns for 3 years | -89.25 | 2.38 | -3,755% |
| Returns for 5 years | -91.51 | -13.86 | 660% |
| Returns for 10 years | -85.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers