Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MILN vs SCHG
MILN vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts MILN vs SCHG
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Price$44.33
Change-$0.33 (-0.74%)
Volume$147
Net Assets111.4M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.44
Change-$1.06 (-3.26%)
Volume$22.94M
Net Assets52.49B
MILN vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MILN vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MILN is a Hold and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.5B vs. MILN (111M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than MILN: SCHG (-3.617) vs MILN (-4.825). MILN was incepted earlier than SCHG: MILN (10 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than MILN (0.50). SCHG has a higher turnover MILN (10.95) vs MILN (10.95).
| MILN | SCHG | MILN / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -4.825 | -3.617 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 111M | 52.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.04 | 1,250% |
| Turnover | 10.95 | 27.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.37 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MILN | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MILN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MILN has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MILN jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MILN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILN | 100% | -2.97% | ||
| META - MILN | 74% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| AMZN - MILN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| CVNA - MILN | 73% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| BKNG - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | -9.32% | ||
| SOFI - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
More | ||||