MIGI
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.34M
NRSCF
Price
$7.18
Change
+$0.08 (+1.13%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
21.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MIGI vs NRSCF

Header iconMIGI vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts MIGI vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Mawson Infrastructure Group
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$241.02K
Capitalization6.34M
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.18
Change+$0.08 (+1.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization21.03B
MIGI vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MIGI vs. NRSCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIGI is a Hold and NRSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MIGI: $0.30 vs. NRSCF: $7.18)
Brand notoriety: MIGI and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MIGI: 69% vs. NRSCF: 0%
Market capitalization -- MIGI: $6.34M vs. NRSCF: $21.03B
MIGI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $6.34M. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $21.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MIGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MIGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than MIGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MIGI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MIGI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MIGI and NRSCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MIGI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -24.94% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRSCF($21B) has a higher market cap than MIGI($6.34M). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.087 vs. MIGI (-63.497). MIGI has less debt than NRSCF: MIGI (26.6M) vs NRSCF (15.59T). NRSCF has higher revenues than MIGI: NRSCF (1.73T) vs MIGI (50.7M).
MIGINRSCFMIGI / NRSCF
Capitalization6.34M21B0%
EBITDA-13.25MN/A-
Gain YTD-63.49725.087-253%
P/E RatioN/A8.67-
Revenue50.7M1.73T0%
Total Cash3.24MN/A-
Total Debt26.6M15.59T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIGI vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
MIGI
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9575
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIGI (76). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIGI (100). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MIGI (100). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIGI (95). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MIGI (95). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MIGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MIGINRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYRX10.351.50
+16.95%
CryoPort
FTCI6.280.29
+4.84%
FTC Solar
WNW1.860.02
+1.09%
Meiwu Technology Company Limited
PPBI24.49N/A
N/A
Pacific Premier Bancorp
APG34.96-0.06
-0.17%
APi Group Corporation

MIGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIGI and HUT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIGI and HUT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIGI
1D Price
Change %
MIGI100%
+6.67%
HUT - MIGI
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
GRYP - MIGI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTM - MIGI
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
HIVE - MIGI
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
APLD - MIGI
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and SAIH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and SAIH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
SAIH - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
CCORF - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STGC - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
MQBKY - NRSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More