Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIGBX vs RGEBX
MIGBX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MIGBX vs RGEBX
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$29.56
Change-$4.93 (-14.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MIGBX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIGBX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIGBX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MIGBX (10.3B). MIGBX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . MIGBX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MIGBX (32 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: RGEBX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. MIGBX (-8.74). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. MIGBX (-6.10).
| MIGBX | RGEBX | MIGBX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.08 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.08 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.378 | -1.057 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 336B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 1.80 | -486% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.56 | 41.63 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.10 | 9.88 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.90 | 110.02 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers