Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIGBX vs RGAHX
MIGBX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts MIGBX vs RGAHX
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$29.56
Change-$4.93 (-14.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
MIGBX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIGBX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIGBX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MIGBX (10.3B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than MIGBX: RGAHX (0.43) vs MIGBX (0.00). MIGBX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MIGBX (32 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: RGAHX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. MIGBX (-8.74). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. MIGBX (-6.10).
| MIGBX | RGAHX | MIGBX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.44 | 332% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.44 | 332% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.378 | -1.010 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 336B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 2.79 | -313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.56 | 45.40 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.10 | 13.96 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.90 | 119.50 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers