Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIGBX vs RGACX
MIGBX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MIGBX vs RGACX
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$33.63
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
MIGBX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIGBX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIGBX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MIGBX (12.1B). RGACX pays higher dividends than MIGBX: RGACX (0.07) vs MIGBX (0.00). MIGBX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MIGBX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: RGACX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. MIGBX (-2.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. MIGBX (12.93).
| MIGBX | RGACX | MIGBX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.94 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.94 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.159 | 14.044 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 329B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.24 | 14.08 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.72 | 41.19 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 41.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.51 | 83.68 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement