MIDLF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.04 (+13.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
36.61M
MJDLF
Price
$7.44
Change
+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
608.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MIDLF vs MJDLF

Header iconMIDLF vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts MIDLF vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
Midland Expl
Price$0.34
Change+$0.04 (+13.33%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization36.61M
Major Drilling Group International
Price$7.44
Change+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization608.69M
MIDLF vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MIDLF vs. MJDLF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDLF is a Hold and MJDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MIDLF: $0.34 vs. MJDLF: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: MIDLF and MJDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MIDLF: 37% vs. MJDLF: 144%
Market capitalization -- MIDLF: $36.61M vs. MJDLF: $608.69M
MIDLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $36.61M. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $608.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MIDLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MIDLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than MIDLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MIDLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MIDLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than MIDLF.

Price Growth

MIDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.34% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJDLF($609M) has a higher market cap than MIDLF($36.6M). MIDLF YTD gains are higher at: 66.994 vs. MJDLF (31.413). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. MIDLF (-1.83M). MJDLF has more cash in the bank: 46M vs. MIDLF (5.91M). MIDLF has less debt than MJDLF: MIDLF (269K) vs MJDLF (37.1M). MJDLF has higher revenues than MIDLF: MJDLF (728M) vs MIDLF (146K).
MIDLFMJDLFMIDLF / MJDLF
Capitalization36.6M609M6%
EBITDA-1.83M103M-2%
Gain YTD66.99431.413213%
P/E RatioN/A32.06-
Revenue146K728M0%
Total Cash5.91M46M13%
Total Debt269K37.1M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIDLF vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
MIDLF
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
9585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MIDLF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (79). This means that MIDLF’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MIDLF (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MIDLF (95). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MIDLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (41). This means that MIDLF’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MIDLF (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MIDLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MIDLFMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MIDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEQRX45.390.09
+0.20%
MFS Global Equity R2
TTMIX177.150.15
+0.08%
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech I
PRVRX13.47N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R
MOJCX14.70N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Momentum C
CRTSX12.33-0.03
-0.24%
Catholic Rsp Invst Mlt-Styl US Eq Ins

MIDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIDLF and MACQF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIDLF and MACQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIDLF
1D Price
Change %
MIDLF100%
+13.33%
MACQF - MIDLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRF - MIDLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MKRIF - MIDLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
MJDLF - MIDLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
MALRY - MIDLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with AOTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then AOTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
+2.59%
AOTVF - MJDLF
33%
Loosely correlated
+8.01%
ERMAY - MJDLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAMZF - MJDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
SMDZF - MJDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More