Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIDE vs XMHQ
MIDE vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts MIDE vs XMHQ
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scrd & Scrn ETF
Price$31.70
Change-$0.37 (-1.15%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets4.46M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$103.77
Change-$0.17 (-0.16%)
Volume$209.73K
Net Assets5.19B
MIDE vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIDE vs. XMHQ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDE is a Hold and XMHQ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.19B vs. MIDE (4.46M). XMHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MIDE: XMHQ (5.891) vs MIDE (4.768). MIDE was incepted earlier than XMHQ: MIDE (5 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). MIDE (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover MIDE (35.00) vs MIDE (35.00).
| MIDE | XMHQ | MIDE / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 4.768 | 5.891 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 4.46M | 5.19B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.25 | 60% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 58.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 1.46 | 0.63 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MIDE | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MIDE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIDE has been closely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MIDE jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MIDE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIDE | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBNY - MIDE | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KAR - MIDE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| WKC - MIDE | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CABO - MIDE | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| GTM - MIDE | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| OC - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||