Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIDE vs XMHQ
MIDE vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts MIDE vs XMHQ
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scrd & Scrn ETF
Price$33.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
Volume$238
Net Assets3.7M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$104.78
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
Volume$95.41K
Net Assets5.17B
MIDE vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIDE vs. XMHQ commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDE is a Buy and XMHQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.17B vs. MIDE (3.7M). MIDE has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: MIDE (11.350) vs XMHQ (6.921). MIDE was incepted earlier than XMHQ: MIDE (5 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). MIDE (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover MIDE (28.00) vs MIDE (28.00).
| MIDE | XMHQ | MIDE / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 11.350 | 6.921 | 164% |
| Net Assets | 3.7M | 5.17B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.25 | 60% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 58.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 0.64 | 222% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MIDE | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MIDE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIDE has been closely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MIDE jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MIDE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIDE | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| SBNY - MIDE | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KAR - MIDE | 71% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WKC - MIDE | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CR - MIDE | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ESAB - MIDE | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| OC - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||