It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MIDD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MIDD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MIDD (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.90% price change this week, while NPWR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -3.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.03%.
MIDD is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
NPWR is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
MIDD | NPWR | MIDD / NPWR | |
Capitalization | 8.62B | 813M | 1,060% |
EBITDA | 772M | -7.24M | -10,664% |
Gain YTD | -8.460 | -4.950 | 171% |
P/E Ratio | 21.39 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.04B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 247M | 645M | 38% |
Total Debt | 2.45B | 3K | 81,733,333% |
MIDD | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MIDD | NPWR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago36% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago64% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago69% | 5 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago31% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago37% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIDD has been loosely correlated with KMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MIDD jumps, then KMT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MIDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MIDD | 100% | +1.51% | ||
KMT - MIDD | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
HLMN - MIDD | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
JBT - MIDD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
LECO - MIDD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
RBC - MIDD | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPWR has been loosely correlated with JGHAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPWR jumps, then JGHAF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPWR | 100% | +5.96% | ||
JGHAF - NPWR | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BLDP - NPWR | 30% Poorly correlated | +8.00% | ||
GTLS - NPWR | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
MIDD - NPWR | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
GTES - NPWR | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More |