Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIDCX vs OSMNX
MIDCX vs OSMNX Comparison
Open Charts MIDCX vs OSMNX
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.24
Change-$0.27 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83B
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
Price$38.79
Change-$0.40 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.92B
MIDCX vs OSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIDCX vs. OSMNX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDCX is a StrongBuy and OSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.84B vs. OSMNX (3.92B). MIDCX pays higher dividends than OSMNX: MIDCX (1.39) vs OSMNX (1.05). MIDCX was incepted earlier than OSMNX: MIDCX (25 years) vs OSMNX (24 years). MIDCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than OSMNX (1.63). OSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX (1000) and OSMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. OSMNX (0.39). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.12 vs. OSMNX (-15.84).
| MIDCX | OSMNX | MIDCX / OSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.63 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.63 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.613 | 16.915 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 3.92B | 174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 0.39 | 1,405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.02 | 1.56 | 641% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | -15.84 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.31 | 12.77 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement