Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIDCX vs OSMAX
MIDCX vs OSMAX Comparison
Open Charts MIDCX vs OSMAX
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.24
Change-$0.27 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83B
Invesco International Small-Mid Com A
Price$42.30
Change-$0.44 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.92B
MIDCX vs OSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIDCX vs. OSMAX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDCX is a StrongBuy and OSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.84B vs. OSMAX (3.92B). MIDCX pays higher dividends than OSMAX: MIDCX (1.39) vs OSMAX (1.22). MIDCX was incepted earlier than OSMAX: MIDCX (25 years) vs OSMAX (28 years). MIDCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than OSMAX (1.37). OSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX (1000) and OSMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. OSMAX (1.35). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.12 vs. OSMAX (-12.96).
| MIDCX | OSMAX | MIDCX / OSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.37 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.37 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.613 | 17.064 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 3.92B | 174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.22 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 1.35 | 408% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.02 | 3.22 | 312% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | -12.96 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.31 | 19.02 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers