Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIDCX vs OSMAX
MIDCX vs OSMAX Comparison
Open Charts MIDCX vs OSMAX
MFS International New Discovery C
Price$30.65
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.48B
Invesco International Small-Mid Com A
Price$43.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
MIDCX vs OSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MIDCX vs. OSMAX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MIDCX is a StrongBuy and OSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.48B vs. OSMAX (3.65B). MIDCX pays higher dividends than OSMAX: MIDCX (1.39) vs OSMAX (1.22). MIDCX was incepted earlier than OSMAX: MIDCX (25 years) vs OSMAX (28 years). MIDCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than OSMAX (1.37). OSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. MIDCX (15.00). MIDCX (1000) and OSMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. OSMAX (5.06). MIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.34 vs. OSMAX (-7.68).
| MIDCX | OSMAX | MIDCX / OSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.37 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.37 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.139 | 17.968 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.48B | 3.65B | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.22 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 5.06 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.26 | 15.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.34 | -7.68 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.53 | 23.54 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement