Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICHX vs TRCLX
MICHX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICHX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.65
Change+$0.40 (+3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.42
Change+$0.44 (+3.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.38M
MICHX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 71.6M vs. TRCLX (60.4M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MICHX: TRCLX (1.39) vs MICHX (1.23). MICHX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICHX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICHX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.20 vs. TRCLX (41.88). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.20 vs. MICHX (-36.69).
| MICHX | TRCLX | MICHX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.10 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.587 | 27.083 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.6M | 60.4M | 119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.20 | 41.88 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.52 | 16.50 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.69 | -0.20 | 18,285% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement