Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICHX vs TRCLX
MICHX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICHX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$12.83
Change+$0.65 (+5.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.17M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
MICHX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICHX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICHX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. TRCLX (66.9M). MICHX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICHX (2.20) vs TRCLX (1.49). MICHX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICHX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MICHX (54.39). MICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICHX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. MICHX (42.61). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. MICHX (-36.41).
| MICHX | TRCLX | MICHX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.03 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.73 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.347 | 10.035 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 66.9M | 108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.49 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.61 | 50.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 28.71 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.41 | -9.00 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement