Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.21
Change+$0.35 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.98
Change-$0.23 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.38M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 441M vs. TRCLX (60.4M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.53) vs TRCLX (1.39). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.77 vs. TRCLX (38.53). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.99 vs. MICFX (-27.61).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.241 | 25.758 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 60.4M | 730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.77 | 38.53 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.02 | 17.76 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.61 | -4.99 | 553% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement