Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.34M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 436M vs. TRCLX (62.5M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.51) vs TRCLX (1.36). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. MICFX (26.73). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. MICFX (-30.15).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.285 | 34.280 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 62.5M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.36 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.73 | 33.77 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.89 | 28.39 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.15 | -6.47 | 466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement