Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.51
Change-$0.77 (-4.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets428.65M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 429M vs. TRCLX (66.9M). TRCLX (1.49) and MICFX (1.42) have matching dividends . MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. MICFX (31.07). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. MICFX (-40.50).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.73 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.921 | 10.035 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 429M | 66.9M | 641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.07 | 50.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.86 | 28.71 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.50 | -9.00 | 450% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers