Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs TRCLX
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Instl
Price$18.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
MICFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. TRCLX (63.5M). MICFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICFX (1.46) vs TRCLX (1.34). MICFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICFX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICFX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (30.01) and MICFX (29.28) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.40 vs. MICFX (-28.52).
| MICFX | TRCLX | MICFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.246 | 33.144 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 63.5M | 718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.28 | 30.01 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.83 | 33.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.52 | -6.40 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers