Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICFX vs RBCRX
MICFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts MICFX vs RBCRX
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.97
Change-$0.13 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.37
Change-$0.14 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45M
MICFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICFX is a StrongBuy and RBCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICFX has more cash in the bank: 441M vs. RBCRX (6.45M). MICFX (1.53) and RBCRX (1.52) have matching dividends . MICFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: MICFX (15 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. MICFX (49.99). MICFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: MICFX (100000) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.31 vs. MICFX (33.02).
| MICFX | RBCRX | MICFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.00 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 6.74 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.905 | 45.529 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250000 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 6.45M | 6,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.52 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.02 | 36.31 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.22 | 50.95 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.81 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.18 | 31.01 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers